{"id":454,"date":"2011-03-29T00:12:09","date_gmt":"2011-03-29T00:12:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/?p=454"},"modified":"2011-03-29T00:49:04","modified_gmt":"2011-03-29T00:49:04","slug":"book-madness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/book-madness\/","title":{"rendered":"Book Madness!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Back when sports fans were filling out their college basketball brackets, I wrote on Facebook that these were the only brackets that interested me:<\/p>\n<p>[ ] ( ) { } < ><\/p>\n<p>I was wrong. <\/p>\n<p>Even better than punctuation brackets is a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.outofprintclothing.com\/bookmadness_a\/302.htm\">book bracket<\/a>. Now this is a competition I can really get into!<\/p>\n<p>Voting on contenders from the British Library and Library of Congress ends at 9:00 a.m. Eastern on Tuesday, March 29. <\/p>\n<p><em>Pride &#038; Prejudice<\/em> is currently losing to <em>1984<\/em>. We simply cannot allow this travesty to occur! Stop reading, go <a href=\"http:\/\/www.outofprintclothing.com\/bookmadness_a\/302.htm\">vote<\/a> for P&#038;P (and help out <em>Jane Eyre<\/em> against <em>Catch-22<\/em> while you&#8217;re there), then come back to read the rest of this blog. \ud83d\ude42  <\/p>\n<p>Do we really want to live in Orwell&#8217;s world over Austen&#8217;s? (Yes, I realize we already do. But this is about fantasy, not reality, right?)<\/p>\n<p>If I understand my son&#8217;s explanation, in a basketball bracket you&#8217;re supposed to choose the team you think will win, which may not be the same as the team you want to win. I can&#8217;t settle for that with books, so I&#8217;ll present both versions of my bracket.<\/p>\n<p>First\u2014how I would have voted in the already-decided contests if I had known about this in time, just for the record:<\/p>\n<p>New York Public Library: I would have gone for <em>The Sound &#038; the Fury<\/em> over <em>Invisible Man<\/em> and <em>Frankenstein<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>Royal Library: I would have gone for <em>Little Women<\/em> over <em>Cuckoo&#8217;s Nest<\/em> and <em>Lolita<\/em> (almost anything over <em>Lolita<\/em>) and <em>The Scarlet Letter<\/em> over <em>Slaughterhouse Five<\/em>. I also would have voted for <em>The Hobbit<\/em> over <em>Great Expectations<\/em> and even over <em>Huck Finn<\/em>, though both of those would have been tough calls.<\/p>\n<p>British Library: I would probably have gone for <em>Wuthering Heights<\/em> over <em>Dorian Gray<\/em>, though Heathcliff is a creepy psycho, not a great romantic hero. <em>Ulysses<\/em> vs. <em>Heart of Darkness<\/em>\u2014who cares? Yes, Conrad and Joyce were both influences on Fitzgerald, but I have never enjoyed reading either one of them. Haven&#8217;t tried in a couple of decades though, so maybe I should give them another try.<\/p>\n<p>Library of Congress. I would have gone for <em>Anna Karenina<\/em> over <em>Catch-22<\/em> and <em>The Count of Monte Cristo<\/em> over <em>Grapes of Wrath<\/em>. And although my literature students would be shocked to find me preferring Hemingway to anything, I&#8217;d rather have <em>The Sun Also Rises <\/em>than <em>A Clockwork Orange<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>However, all of those questions are already decided. Here are my votes today:<\/p>\n<p>British Library: <em>Moby-Dick<\/em> over <em>Ulysses<\/em> and <em>Pride and Prejudice<\/em> over <em>1984<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Library of Congress: <em>Jane Eyre<\/em> over <em>Catch-22 <\/em>and <em>Catcher in the Rye<\/em> (which I don&#8217;t especially like and barely remember) over <em>A Clockwork Orange<\/em> (which I especially dislike). <\/p>\n<p>Right now it&#8217;s not looking good for Austen and Bront\u00eb. \ud83d\ude41 <\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t know when the next vote will be, but here are my picks for the next round:<\/p>\n<p>NY Public Library: <em>The Great Gatsby<\/em> over <em>Frankenstein <\/em>and <em>Fahrenheit 451<\/em> over <em>Dr. Zhivago<\/em> <\/p>\n<p>Royal Library: <em>Huckleberry Finn<\/em> over <em>Lolita<\/em> and <em>To Kill a Mockingbird<\/em> over <em>Slaughterhouse Five<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Other than the possibility of the wildly popular movie helping <em>Zhivago<\/em> beat <em>Fahrenheit<\/em>, I think that is probably how these will go.<\/p>\n<p>MY FINAL FOUR:<\/p>\n<p><em>The Great Gatsby<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Pride and Prejudice<\/em><br \/>\n<em>To Kill a Mockingbird<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Jane Eyre<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Mockingbird<\/em> vs. <em>Jane Eyre<\/em>: I think I&#8217;d have to choose <em>Mockingbird<\/em>. I&#8217;ve loved <em>Jane Eyre<\/em> longer, but <em>Mockingbird <\/em>had such a powerful effect on me when I first read it only last year that I read it twice and listened to the unabridged audio twice within about 6 months.<\/p>\n<p><em>Gatsby<\/em> vs. <em>P&#038;P<\/em>: Not sure I can do this&#8230;deep breath&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m sorry, Scott, but although you&#8217;re an absolute genius and I adore your words, sentences, and rhythm, I have to go with Jane\u2014I love her characters and her world more. (I hope this public confession doesn&#8217;t get my book about Fitzgerald pulled from library shelves. <g>)<\/p>\n<p>So&#8230;I&#8217;m sure some of my readers will disagree with some of my choices. As I tell my literature students, I don&#8217;t care so much whether you agree or disagree with me. I just want to know that you have read the book and have a thoughtful opinion about it. (Even if . . . gulp . . . you vote for 1984 over P&#038;P. But tell me why. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.outofprintclothing.com\/bookmadness_a\/302.htm\">Here&#8217;s the Out of Print website where you can vote.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.outofprintclothing.com\/bookmadness_a\/302.htm<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Back when sports fans were filling out their college basketball brackets, I wrote on Facebook that these were the only brackets that interested me: [ ] ( ) { } < > I was wrong. Even better than punctuation brackets is a book bracket. Now this is a competition I can really get into! Voting &#8230; <a title=\"Book Madness!\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/book-madness\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Book Madness!\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-classic-literature","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=454"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eclectic-bibliophile.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}